lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/4] regulator: mp886x: implement set_ramp_delay
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:17:29AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> I found the reason, the three patches in v2 were applied to for-next tree.
> Should I renew patches based on for-next? Since the "mps,switch-frequency"
> binding isn't released and used, I think I can send new patches to convert
> mps,switch-frequency to mps,switch-frequency-hz.

Yes, please - for-next is best for anything that isn't a bug fix.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-21 11:59    [W:0.259 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site