Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:57:24 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] regulator: mp886x: implement set_ramp_delay |
| |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:17:29AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> I found the reason, the three patches in v2 were applied to for-next tree. > Should I renew patches based on for-next? Since the "mps,switch-frequency" > binding isn't released and used, I think I can send new patches to convert > mps,switch-frequency to mps,switch-frequency-hz.
Yes, please - for-next is best for anything that isn't a bug fix. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |