Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:29:05 -0400 | From | Vivek Goyal <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] virtio: Implement get_shm_region for PCI transport |
| |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 07:51:56PM -0700, Gurchetan Singh wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 7:50 AM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:05:17AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:55:10PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > From: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com> > > > > > > > > On PCI the shm regions are found using capability entries; > > > > find a region by searching for the capability. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org > > > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> > > > > > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > > > > > > [..] > > > > +static bool vp_get_shm_region(struct virtio_device *vdev, > > > > + struct virtio_shm_region *region, u8 id) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev); > > > > + struct pci_dev *pci_dev = vp_dev->pci_dev; > > > > + u8 bar; > > > > + u64 offset, len; > > > > + phys_addr_t phys_addr; > > > > + size_t bar_len; > > > > + > > > > + if (!virtio_pci_find_shm_cap(pci_dev, id, &bar, &offset, &len)) { > > > > + return false; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + phys_addr = pci_resource_start(pci_dev, bar); > > > > + bar_len = pci_resource_len(pci_dev, bar); > > > > + > > > > + if ((offset + len) < offset) { > > > > + dev_err(&pci_dev->dev, "%s: cap offset+len overflow > > detected\n", > > > > + __func__); > > > > + return false; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + if (offset + len > bar_len) { > > > > + dev_err(&pci_dev->dev, "%s: bar shorter than cap > > offset+len\n", > > > > + __func__); > > > > + return false; > > > > + } > > > > > > Maybe move this to a common header so the checks can be reused by > > > other transports? Can be a patch on top. > > > > Will do as patch on top once these patches get merged. > > > > There's also some minor checkpatch complaints. I fixed them with the > series I sent out with virtio-gpu.
Thanks Gurchetan. I will post the patch with V3 posting anyway. We both need these patches. So whatever gets merged in the tree first, other person can use it.
Vivek
| |