Messages in this thread | | | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Thu, 13 Aug 2020 22:41:51 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] iio:temperature:mlx90632: Some stylefixing leftovers |
| |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 4:12 PM Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 13:01, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:53 AM Crt Mori <cmo@melexis.com> wrote:
...
> > > -#define MLX90632_REF_12 12LL /**< ResCtrlRef value of Ch 1 or Ch 2 */ > > > -#define MLX90632_REF_3 12LL /**< ResCtrlRef value of Channel 3 */ > > > -#define MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM 31 /**< Maximum measurements in list */ > > > -#define MLX90632_SLEEP_DELAY_MS 3000 /**< Autosleep delay */
> > > +#define MLX90632_REF_12 12LL /* ResCtrlRef value of Ch 1 or Ch 2 */ > > > +#define MLX90632_REF_3 12LL /* ResCtrlRef value of Channel 3 */ > > > +#define MLX90632_MAX_MEAS_NUM 31 /* Maximum measurements in list */ > > > +#define MLX90632_SLEEP_DELAY_MS 3000 /* Autosleep delay */ > > > #define MLX90632_EXTENDED_LIMIT 27000 /* Extended mode raw value limit */ > > > > This was actually in doxy (perhaps kernel doc also understands this) > > format of description. > > Can you double check that the kernel doc is okay / not okay with it? > > > > If it is okay, perhaps it's better to convert others to that format > > rather than dropping it. > > > It is indeed from doxygen and looking at other drivers it should not > be OK. I checked the docs and it does not say in fact. Maybe Jonathan > knows, but he was already OK with these changes in v1.
I'm fine with either choice.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |