Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from PARAVIRT_XXL | From | Jürgen Groß <> | Date | Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:42:51 +0200 |
| |
On 10.08.20 18:53, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 8/10/20 12:39 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote: >> On 09.08.20 04:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val) >>>> { >>>> pteval_t ret; >>>> - if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long)) >>>> - ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >> >>>> 32); >>>> - else >>>> - ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); >>>> + ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); >>>> return (pte_t) { .pte = ret }; >>> >>> >>> Can this now simply return (pte_t) ret? >> >> I don't think so, but I can turn it into >> >> return native_make_pte(PVOP_CALLEE1(...)); > > > I thought that since now this is only built for 64-bit we don't have to > worry about different pte_t definitions and can do what we do for > example, for __pgd()?
Yes, I did that:
return (pte_t) { ret };
Juergen
| |