lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next RFC 01/13] devlink: Add reload level option to devlink reload command
From
Date

On 7/31/2020 2:11 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:30:45 +0300 Moshe Shemesh wrote:
>>>>> My expectations would be that the driver must perform the lowest
>>>>> reset level possible that satisfies the requested functional change.
>>>>> IOW driver may do more, in fact it should be acceptable for the
>>>>> driver to always for a full HW reset (unless --live or other
>>>>> constraint is specified).
>>>> OK, but some combinations may still not be valid for specific driver
>>>> even if it tries lowest level possible.
>>> Can you give an example?
>> For example take the combination of fw-live-patch and param-init.
>>
>> The fw-live-patch needs no re-initialization, while the param-init
>> requires driver re-initialization.
>>
>> So the only way to do that is to the one command after the other, not
>> really combining.
> You need to read my responses more carefully. I don't have
> fw-live-patch in my proposal. The operation is fw-activate,
> --live is independent and an constraint, not an operation.


OK, I probably didn't get the whole picture right.

I am not sure I got it yet, please review if that's the uAPI that you
mean to:

devlink dev reload [ net-ns-respawn { PID | NAME | ID } ] [
driver-param-init ] [ fw-activate [ --live] ]


Also, I recall that before devlink param was added the devlink reload
was used for devlink resources.

I am not sure it is still used for devlink resources as I don't see it
in the code of devlink reload.

But if it is we probably should add it as another operation.

Jiri, please comment on that.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-01 23:33    [W:0.103 / U:8.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site