lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: remove dead bdi congestion leftovers
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:58:58AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/8/20 11:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:14:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 7/1/20 3:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> Hi Jens,
> >>>
> >>> we have a lot of bdi congestion related code that is left around without
> >>> any use. This series removes it in preparation of sorting out the bdi
> >>> lifetime rules properly.
> >>
> >> Please run series like this through a full compilation, for both this one
> >> and the previous series I had to fix up issues like this:
> >>
> >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function ‘bch_cached_dev_request_init’:
> >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1233:18: warning: unused variable ‘g’ [-Wunused-variable]
> >> 1233 | struct gendisk *g = dc->disk.disk;
> >> | ^
> >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function ‘bch_flash_dev_request_init’:
> >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1320:18: warning: unused variable ‘g’ [-Wunused-variable]
> >> 1320 | struct gendisk *g = d->disk;
> >> | ^
> >>
> >> Did the same here, applied it.
> >
> > And just like the previous one I did, and the compiler did not complain.
> > There must be something about certain gcc versions not warning about
> > variables that are initialized but not otherwise used.
>
> Are you using gcc-10? It sucks for that. gcc-9 seems to reliably hit
> these cases for me, not sure why gcc-10 doesn't. And the ones quoted
> above are about as trivial as they can get.

gcc-9.3 from Debian -testing. And yes, I'm really surprised it didn't
find those.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-09 16:02    [W:0.048 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site