lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6779 driver
From
Date
On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 20:32 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/6/20 8:30 PM, Neal Liu wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 09:13 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 7/6/20 2:28 AM, Neal Liu wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/devapc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/mediatek/devapc/Kconfig
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..b0f7d0e
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/devapc/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> >>> +config MTK_DEVAPC
> >>> + tristate "Mediatek Device APC Support"
> >>> + help
> >>> + Device APC is a HW IP controlling internal device security.
> >>
> >> preferably: s/HW/hardware/
> >>
> >>> + MediaTek bus frabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> >>
> >> fabric
> >>
> >>> + protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> >>> + bus masters.
> >>> + Device APC prevents malicious access to internal devices.
> >>> +
> >>> +config DEVAPC_MT6779
> >>> + tristate "Mediatek MT6779 Device APC driver"
> >>> + select MTK_DEVAPC
> >>> + help
> >>> + Say yes here to enable support Mediatek MT6779 Device APC driver.
> >>
> >> support for Mediatek
> >>
> >>> + This driver mainly used to handle the violation with 1 DEVAPC AO/PDs.
> >>
> >> This driver is mainly used ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> What is that meaningless string of chars? ^^^^^^^
> >
> > I did not see any meaningless string of chars from my original patch.
> > Is there something wrong?
>
> To someone who is reading the Kconfig help text but is unfamiliar with this device,
> I would say that "1 DEVAPC AO/PDs" is not helpful at all.

Got it, I'll try to make it more readable.

>
> > [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/6/168__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!0pAmVqUrtDEDPT-QkQENXso-_umOz2nbe-DDIlMb1sEsD57BaKtDZF47QFTfMSP-$
> >
> >>
> >>> + The violation information are logged for further analysis or
> >>
> >> is
> >>
> >>> + countermeasures.
> >>
> >> thanks.
> >
>
>
> thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-07 05:40    [W:0.055 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site