[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology
    On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 09:39:29 +1000
    Dave Airlie <> wrote:

    > I don't totally agree on that, because like the CoC discussion, people
    > need concrete examples. People need reasons, saying simply "be
    > inclusive" doesn't work.

    Which people? because so far the only people I've seen take these
    terminologies out of computing context, are those who are only voicing
    their "concern" out of bad faith, as well as those who fall for the
    concern-trolling bait. The meta-discussion serves to stir up noise and
    waste time that's better spent on other things.

    History pains, sure, but I believe it serves no justice to erase every
    trace of bad things that happened in history. That includes use of
    words tangentially related to such events.

    wowaname <>

     \ /
      Last update: 2020-07-05 20:01    [W:7.716 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site