lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] m68k/amiga: Add missing platform_device_unregister() call in amiga_init_devices()
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Add the missing platform_device_unregister() before return
> > from amiga_init_devices() in the error handling case.
>
> Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message?
>
>
> …
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/amiga/platform.c
> > @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static int __init amiga_init_devices(void)
> > return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> > error = platform_device_add_data(pdev, &a1200_ide_pdata,
> > sizeof(a1200_ide_pdata));
> > - if (error)
> > + if (error) {
> > + platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> > return error;
> > + }
> > }
> …
>
> I suggest to add a jump target for the desired exception handling.
>
> if (error)
> + goto unregister_device;
>
>
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-28 17:55    [W:0.031 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site