Messages in this thread | | | From | "RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682 | Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:39:47 +0000 |
| |
I will drop this patch series and will send new series.
Thanks,
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 9:06 PM To: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@amd.com> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>; moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>; open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>; Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Mukunda, Vijendar <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>; Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@amd.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:24:42PM +0000, RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO wrote: > [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:48 PM
I'm not seeing any new text in here?
> To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>; RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO > <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@amd.com> > Cc: moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... > <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; Liam > Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>; open list > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>; > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>; Deucher, Alexander > <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Mukunda, Vijendar > <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>; Enric Balletbo i Serra > <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@amd.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build > rt5682 > > > > On 7/28/20 7:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:59:50AM +0000, RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO wrote: > > > >> So Actually for rt5682 codec Now in 5.8 there are three flags : > >> SND_SOC_RT5682 > >> SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C > >> SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW > > > >> But till 5.7.8 we have > >> SND_SOC_RT5682 > >> SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW > > > >> So in our design we were using SND_SOC_RT5682 which build > >> snd_soc_rt5682.ko Creates the respective codec_dais as defined in > >> that .ko > > > >> If we use SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C we get snd_soc_rt5682_I2c.ko , it is not creating the expected codec_dai links. > > > > Could you be more specific about the way in which "it is not > > creating the expected codec_dai links" please? What are you > > expecting to happen and what happens instead? Do you see any error messages for example? > > > >> As there are three flags defined in codecs, I expect that previous > >> one which we were using(SND_SOC_RT5682) is not a wrong flag and I > >> expect to use > >> SND_SOC_RT5682 as it is still available. > > > > Given that the core module does not register with any bus it is > > difficult to see how that could possibly work - the core module > > doesn't contain a driver at all. Have you tested this change? > > I share Mark's point. Have you tested this change on top of Mark's tree, or only on top of the stable kernel? > Ok. I will drop that patch and send the other series. > > Thanks, >
| |