Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | [PATCH v4 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled | Date | Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:09:35 +0200 |
| |
Hi All,
On Monday, July 27, 2020 5:13:40 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, July 16, 2020 7:37:04 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This really is a v2 of this patch: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11663271/ > > > > with an extra preceding cleanup patch to avoid making unrelated changes in the > > [2/2]. > > Almost the same as before, but the first patch has been reworked to handle > errors in store_energy_performance_preference() correctly and rebased on top > of the current linux-pm.git branch. > > No functional changes otherwise.
One more update of the second patch.
Namely, I realized that the hwp_dynamic_boost sysfs switch was present in the passive mode after the v3 (and the previous versions) of that patch which isn't correct, so this modifies it to avoid exposing hwp_dynamic_boost in the passive mode.
The first patch is the same as in the v2.
Thanks!
| |