[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subject[PATCH v4 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
Hi All,

On Monday, July 27, 2020 5:13:40 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, July 16, 2020 7:37:04 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > This really is a v2 of this patch:
> >
> >
> >
> > with an extra preceding cleanup patch to avoid making unrelated changes in the
> > [2/2].
> Almost the same as before, but the first patch has been reworked to handle
> errors in store_energy_performance_preference() correctly and rebased on top
> of the current linux-pm.git branch.
> No functional changes otherwise.

One more update of the second patch.

Namely, I realized that the hwp_dynamic_boost sysfs switch was present in the
passive mode after the v3 (and the previous versions) of that patch which isn't
correct, so this modifies it to avoid exposing hwp_dynamic_boost in the passive

The first patch is the same as in the v2.


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-28 17:15    [W:0.231 / U:11.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site