lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 11/11] x86: support i386 with Clang
    Date
    Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:

    I'm glad I looked myself at this.

    > We also don't want to swap the use of "=q" with "=r". For 64b, it
    > doesn't matter. For 32b, it's possible that a 32b register without a 8b
    > lower alias (i.e. ESI, EDI, EBP) is selected which the assembler will
    > then reject.

    The above is really garbage.

    We don't want? It's simply not possible to do so, because ...

    64b,32b,8b. For heavens sake is it too much asked to write a changelog
    with understandable wording instead of ambiguous abbreviations?

    There is no maximum character limit for changelogs.

    Thanks,

    tglx

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-07-23 11:15    [W:4.063 / U:1.244 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site