lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] dt-binding: mediatek: mt8192: update mtk-wdt document
From
Date


On 23/07/2020 23:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 05:07:31PM +0800, Seiya Wang wrote:
>> From: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@mediatek.com>
>>
>> update mtk-wdt document for MT8192 platform
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@mediatek.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt
>> index 4dd36bd3f1ad..d760ca8a630e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt
>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ Required properties:
>> "mediatek,mt7629-wdt", "mediatek,mt6589-wdt": for MT7629
>> "mediatek,mt8183-wdt", "mediatek,mt6589-wdt": for MT8183
>> "mediatek,mt8516-wdt", "mediatek,mt6589-wdt": for MT8516
>> + "mediatek,mt8192-wdt": for MT8192
>> +
>
> So, not compatible with "mediatek,mt6589-wdt"? Is so, perhaps summarize
> what the differences are.
>

Hm, looks to me as if the binding description for mt2712 and mt8183 isn't
correct, as we have a OF data just as we have for mt8192 now. Could you fix this
in a separate patch?

Regards,
Matthias

>>
>> - reg : Specifies base physical address and size of the registers.
>>
>> --
>> 2.14.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-24 00:03    [W:0.044 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site