lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/10] block: scsi: sd: use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size
From
Date
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 11:25 +0000, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/07/21 19:55, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Use blk_is_valid_logical_block_size instead of hardcoded list
>
> s/hardcoded list/hardcoded checks./
Done, thanks!

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 5 +----
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > index d90fefffe31b7..f012e7397b058 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> > @@ -2520,10 +2520,7 @@ sd_read_capacity(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
> > unsigned char *buffer)
> > "assuming 512.\n");
> > }
> >
> > - if (sector_size != 512 &&
> > - sector_size != 1024 &&
> > - sector_size != 2048 &&
> > - sector_size != 4096) {
> > + if (!blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(sector_size)) {
> > sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp, "Unsupported sector size
> > %d.\n",
> > sector_size);
> > /*
> >
>
> With the commit message fixed, looks OK.
>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-21 14:56    [W:0.512 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site