Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Sun, 19 Jul 2020 11:27:39 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts |
| |
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 7:35 AM Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can we merge lines that we don't want to merge? > > pr_cont() -> IRQ -> pr_cont() -> NMI -> pr_cont()
That pr_cont in either IRQ or NMI context would be a bug.
You can't validly have a PR_CONT without the non-cont that precedes it.
Linus
| |