lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: pci: add device id for Intel FPGA PAC N3000
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:46:16AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:14:19AM +0000, Wu, Hao wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:00:40AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 7/9/20 3:14 AM, Wu, Hao wrote:
> > > > >> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 05:10:49PM +0800, Wu, Hao wrote:
> > > > >>>> Subject: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: pci: add device id for Intel FPGA PAC N3000
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Add PCIe Device ID for Intel FPGA PAC N3000.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
> > > > >>>> ---
> > > > >>>> drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 2 ++
> > > > >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > >>>> index 73b5153..824aecf 100644
> > > > >>>> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > >>>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > > >>>> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev
> > > *pcidev)
> > > > >>>> #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X0xBCBD
> > > > >>>> #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X0xBCC0
> > > > >>>> #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_DSC_1_X0x09C4
> > > > >>>> +#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_PAC_N3000 0x0B30
> > > > >>> Should we drop _PF_ here? and also do you want _INTEL_ here?
> > > > >> I think we could keep _PF_, also there is no need to support VF of pac
> > > > >> n3000 in product now, but it does exist (ID: 0x0b31).
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering about the vf id, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> And add _INTEL_ is good to me.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Then how about this one:
> > > > >> #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INTEL_PAC_N3000 0x0B30
> > > > > I am just considering the alignment with ids defined in
> > > include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > > > So drop _PF_ before _INTEL_ would be better? : )
> > > >
> > > > To be consistent, all the id's are intel and all could drop pf.
> > >
> > > That's good to me after checking the pci_ids.h. So we have:
> > >
> > > #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_N3000 0x0B30
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
> >
> > Hao
>
> Heads up I was gonna send out the PR early next week. I can fix this up
> myself if you want if you want or you can resend it?

I sent the v2 patch for this. Please help check it.

Thanks,
Yilun

>
> Thanks,
> Moritz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-13 03:57    [W:0.247 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site