lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 42/75] x86/sev-es: Setup GHCB based boot #VC handler
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:07:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for
> them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I
> still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols
> are?

Hmmkay, I see vc_no_ghcb doing

call do_vc_no_ghcb

and that's setup in early_idt_setup().

vc_boot_ghcb(), OTOH, is called by do_early_exception() only so that one
could be called handle_vc_boot_ghcb(), no? I.e., I don't see it being an
IDT entry point.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-04 17:30    [W:0.127 / U:2.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site