lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5.7 000/265] 5.7.7-rc1 review
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:38:45AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 07:18:26PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 02:37:53PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> > Hi Sasha,
>> >
>> > On 6/29/20 9:13 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > >
>> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.7.7 release.
>> > > There are 265 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> > > let me know.
>> > >
>> > > Responses should be made by Wed 01 Jul 2020 03:14:48 PM UTC.
>> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> > >
>> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.7.y&id2=v5.7.6
>> > >
>> >
>> > Looks like patch naming convention has changed. My scripts look
>> > for the following convention Greg uses. Are you planning to use
>> > the above going forward? My scripts failed looking for the usual
>> > naming convention.
>> >
>> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.7.6-rc1.gz
>> > or in the git tree and branch at:
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.7.y
>> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> Sorry for that. I was hoping to avoid using the signed upload mechanism
>> Greg was using by simply pointing the links to automatically generated
>> patches on cgit (the git.kernel.org interface).
>>
>> Would it be ok to change the pattern matching here? Something like this
>> should work for both Greg's format and my own (and whatever may come
>> next):
>>
>> grep -A1 "The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:" | tail -n1 | sed 's/\t//'
>
>If those don't work, I can still push out -rc1 patches.
>
>It might be best given that the above -rc.git tree is unstable and can,
>and will, change, and patches stored on kernel.org will not.

That's a good point. Maybe we should push tags for -rc releases too?
that would allow us to keep stable links using the git.kernel.org
interface.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-30 17:13    [W:0.149 / U:6.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site