lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] SPI LPC information kernel module
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 09:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Again, which makes it seem like securityfs is not the thing for this, as
> it describes the hardware, not a security model which is what securityfs
> has been for in the past, right?

It describes the hardware platform. From a fwupd perspective I don't
mind if the BC attributes are read from securityfs, sysfs or even read
from an offset in a file from /proc... I guess sysfs makes sense if
securityfs is defined for things like the LSM or lockdown status,
although I also thought sysfs was for devices *in* the platform, not
the platform itself. I guess exposing the platform registers in sysfs
is no more weird than exposing things like the mei device and rfkill.

Richard

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-30 15:58    [W:0.146 / U:4.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site