[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: wait_on_page_bit_common(TASK_KILLABLE, EXCLUSIVE) can miss wakeup?
On 06/30, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> My patch is what actually introduced this ugly
> bit test, but do we even need it at all? If we do then it's
> under-commented, I can't see it wouldn't be racy though. Can we just
> get rid of it entirely?

But then we will need to move io_schedule() down, after test_and_set_bit().
And we will have the same problem with task->state != RUNNING. Plus more
complications with "behavior == DROP".


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-30 12:54    [W:0.043 / U:5.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site