[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu: add NVIDIA implementation for dual ARM MMU-500 usage

On 29/06/2020 23:49, Krishna Reddy wrote:
>>> + if (!nvidia_smmu->bases[0])
>>> + nvidia_smmu->bases[0] = smmu->base;
>>> +
>>> + return nvidia_smmu->bases[inst] + (page << smmu->pgshift); }
>> Not critical -- just a nit: why not put the bases[0] in init()?
> smmu->base is not available during nvidia_smmu_impl_init() call. It is set afterwards in arm-smmu.c.
> It can't be avoided without changing the devm_ioremap() and impl_init() call order in arm-smmu.c.

Why don't we move the call to devm_ioremap_resource() to before
arm_smmu_impl_init() in arm_smmu_device_probe()? From a quick look I
don't see why we cannot do this and seems better than what we are
currently doing which is quite confusing and hard to understand.



 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-30 12:24    [W:0.047 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site