lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix PASID devTLB invalidation
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:25:57 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without
> > PASIDs. The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero
> > PASID for SVA usage.
> >
> > This patch adds a check for PASID value such that devTLB flush with
> > PASID is used for SVA case. This is more efficient in that multiple
> > PASIDs can be used by a single device, when tearing down a PASID
> > entry we shall flush only the devTLB specific to a PASID.
> >
> > Fixes: 6f7db75e1c46 ("iommu/vt-d: Add second level page table")
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c index c81f0f17c6ba..3991a24539a1
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
> > @@ -486,7 +486,16 @@ devtlb_invalidation_with_pasid(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu, qdep = info->ats_qdep;
> > pfsid = info->pfsid;
> >
> > - qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64 -
> > VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> > + /*
> > + * When PASID 0 is used, it indicates RID2PASID(DMA
> > request w/o PASID),
> > + * devTLB flush w/o PASID should be used. For non-zero
> > PASID under
> > + * SVA usage, device could do DMA with multiple PASIDs. It
> > is more
> > + * efficient to flush devTLB specific to the PASID.
> > + */
> > + if (pasid)
>
> How about
>
> if (pasid == PASID_RID2PASID)
> qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64 -
> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT); else
> qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(iommu, sid, pfsid, pasid,
> qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> ?
>
> It makes the code more readable and still works even we reassign
> another pasid for RID2PASID.
>
agreed, thanks.

> Best regards,
> baolu
>
> > + qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(iommu, sid, pfsid, pasid,
> > qdep, 0, 64 - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> > + else
> > + qi_flush_dev_iotlb(iommu, sid, pfsid, qdep, 0, 64
> > - VTD_PAGE_SHIFT); }
> >
> > void intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
> > struct device *dev,

[Jacob Pan]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-30 06:50    [W:0.076 / U:15.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site