Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:48:18 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | [PATCH] rcu: Fixup noinstr warnings |
| |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:38:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> That said; noinstr's __no_sanitize combined with atomic_t might be > 'interesting', because the regular atomic things have explicit > annotations in them. That should give validation warnings for the right > .config, I'll have to go try -- so far I've made sure to never enable > the *SAN stuff.
--- Subject: rcu: Fixup noinstr warnings
A KCSAN build revealed we have explicit annoations through atomic_t usage, switch to arch_atomic_*() for the respective functions.
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_nmi_exit()+0x4d: call to __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter()+0x25: call to __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_nmi_enter()+0x4f: call to __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit()+0x2a: call to __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __rcu_is_watching()+0x25: call to __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index c716eadc7617..162656b80db9 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static noinstr void rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter(void) * next idle sojourn. */ rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! - seq = atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); + seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); // RCU is no longer watching. Better be in extended quiescent state! WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)); @@ -274,13 +274,13 @@ static noinstr void rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit(void) * and we also must force ordering with the next RCU read-side * critical section. */ - seq = atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); + seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); // RCU is now watching. Better not be in an extended quiescent state! rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && !(seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)); if (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK) { - atomic_andnot(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK, &rdp->dynticks); + arch_atomic_andnot(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK, &rdp->dynticks); smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* _exit after clearing mask. */ } } @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static __always_inline bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void) { struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); - return !(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR); + return !(arch_atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR); } /* @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_exit(void) { struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); + instrumentation_begin(); /* * Check for ->dynticks_nmi_nesting underflow and bad ->dynticks. * (We are exiting an NMI handler, so RCU better be paying attention @@ -705,7 +706,6 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_exit(void) * leave it in non-RCU-idle state. */ if (rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting != 1) { - instrumentation_begin(); trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("--="), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting - 2, atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks)); WRITE_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, /* No store tearing. */ @@ -714,7 +714,6 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_exit(void) return; } - instrumentation_begin(); /* This NMI interrupted an RCU-idle CPU, restore RCU-idleness. */ trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Startirq"), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0, atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks)); WRITE_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0); /* Avoid store tearing. */
| |