lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: drm/nouveau/clk/gm20b: Understanding challenges around gm20b_clk_new()
From
Date
> Ben has explained this problem:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1249592/
> Since the caller will check "pclk" on failure, we don't need to free
> "clk" in gm20b_clk_new() and I think this patch is no longer needed.

* I am curious if it can become easier to see the relationships for
these variables according to mentioned “destructor” calls.

* Did you notice opportunities to improve source code analysis
(or software documentation) accordingly?

Regards,
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-03 07:06    [W:0.050 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site