[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/4] qlge/qlge_main.c: use genric power management
Vaibhav: s/genric/generic/ in the subject

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:09:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav,
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> [auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.8-rc3 next-20200629]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
> url:
> base: 347fa58ff5558075eec98725029c443c80ffbf4a
> config: x86_64-rhel-7.6 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make W=1 ARCH=x86_64
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <>

If the patch has already been merged and we need an incremental patch
that fixes *only* the build issue, I think it's fine to add a
"Reported-by" tag.

But if this patch hasn't been merged anywhere, I think adding the
"Reported-by" tag would be pointless and distracting. This report
should result in a v2 posting of the patch with the build issue fixed.

There will be no evidence of the problem in the v2 patch. The patch
itself contains other changes unrelated to the build issue, so
"Reported-by" makes so sense for them. I would treat this as just
another review comment, and we don't usually credit those in the
commit log (though it's nice if they're mentioned in the v2 cover
letter so reviewers know what changed and why).

Is there any chance kbuild could be made smart enough to suggest the
tag only when it finds an issue in some list of published trees?

> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c: In function 'qlge_resume':
> >> drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c:4793:17: error: 'pdev' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'qdev'?
> 4793 | pci_set_master(pdev);
> | ^~~~
> | qdev
> ...

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-29 20:51    [W:0.038 / U:1.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site