lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Add support for chain1 regulator supply voting
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 5:14 AM Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 3:22 AM
> > To: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>; Kalle Valo
> > <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
> > DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>; linux-wireless <linux-
> > wireless@vger.kernel.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: Add support for chain1 regulator supply
> > voting
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:02 AM Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add support to vote for chain-1 voltage regulator
> > > in WCN3990.
> > >
> > > Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC WLAN.HL.3.1-01040-QCAHLSWMTPLZ-1
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > > index 645ed5f..407a074 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const char * const ath10k_regulators[] = {
> > > "vdd-1.8-xo",
> > > "vdd-1.3-rfa",
> > > "vdd-3.3-ch0",
> > > + "vdd-3.3-ch1",
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> >
> > ...with the slight nit that ${SUBJECT} and description should probably
> > call it "chan1" and not "chain1". Presumably the maintainer can fix
> > when applying.
> >
> > -Doug
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> It has to be chain1 only, not chan1.
> This is the power supply rail for the wlan-chain1

Whoa, really? "ch1" stands for "chain1", not "chan1"? That is
seriously weird (at least to me), but I find at least one document
that agrees with you. Sorry for the mistake!

-Doug

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-29 22:35    [W:0.071 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site