Messages in this thread | | | From | Miguel Ojeda <> | Date | Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:40:11 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: Documentation/translations/it_IT |
| |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 9:02 AM Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de> wrote: > > Is any of you familiar with Golang?
Don't worry about that! I'd expect seasoned C programmers to be able to read Go (or near languages) -- at least to have a general idea of what an algorithm does.
It is not APL, after all :-)
> > @Maintainers Would any of you actually review like this? If yes, is the > pseudo-code not enough?
Well, Kees already mentioned he would like to see it :-) As he said, it is usually the way for bulk patches to present the algorithm/semantic patch/etc. that was used.
It is also useful to have it around so that it can be reused/reapplied later on, too.
> I didn't log that link-by-link. Maybe because I also didn't follow plain > HTTP redirects while opening HTTPS links. Maybe it even matched, but was > added after I made the changes.
It would be nice to have a list of links which cannot be converted, since nowadays they are likely to be the exception rather than the rule.
> * Linus *didn't even respond* (at least I didn't receive anything) to my > catch-them-all patch at all, not even like please not as .gz attachment > or please split by subsystem
Please take into account that LKML volume is huge and Linus (like everybody else) only reads a small subset. Further, as a general rule, Linus shouldn't be picking individual patches to begin with because that skips the review tree.
Cheers, Miguel
| |