Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:34:24 +0200 | From | Jan Kara <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: mm/gup: pin_user_pages.rst: add a "case 5" |
| |
On Sun 31-05-20 22:26:32, John Hubbard wrote: > There are four cases listed in pin_user_pages.rst. These are > intended to help developers figure out whether to use > get_user_pages*(), or pin_user_pages*(). However, the four cases > do not cover all the situations. For example, drivers/vhost/vhost.c > has a "pin, write to page, set page dirty, unpin" case. > > Add a fifth case, to help explain that there is a general pattern > that requires pin_user_pages*() API calls. > > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> > Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> > Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> > Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> --- > Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst > index 4675b04e8829..6068266dd303 100644 > --- a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst > @@ -171,6 +171,24 @@ If only struct page data (as opposed to the actual memory contents that a page > is tracking) is affected, then normal GUP calls are sufficient, and neither flag > needs to be set. > > +CASE 5: Pinning in order to write to the data within the page > +------------------------------------------------------------- > +Even though neither DMA nor Direct IO is involved, just a simple case of "pin, > +write to a page's data, unpin" can cause a problem. Case 5 may be considered a > +superset of Case 1, plus Case 2, plus anything that invokes that pattern. In > +other words, if the code is neither Case 1 nor Case 2, it may still require > +FOLL_PIN, for patterns like this: > + > +Correct (uses FOLL_PIN calls): > + pin_user_pages() > + write to the data within the pages > + unpin_user_pages() > + > +INCORRECT (uses FOLL_GET calls): > + get_user_pages() > + write to the data within the pages > + put_page() > + > page_maybe_dma_pinned(): the whole point of pinning > =================================================== > > -- > 2.26.2 > -- Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> SUSE Labs, CR
| |