lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v8 4/8] PM / EM: add support for other devices than CPUs in Energy Model
From
Date
On 27/05/2020 11:58, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Add support for other devices than CPUs. The registration function
> does not require a valid cpumask pointer and is ready to handle new
> devices. Some of the internal structures has been reorganized in order to
> keep consistent view (like removing per_cpu pd pointers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---

[ ... ]

> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_register_perf_domain);
> +
> +/**
> + * em_dev_unregister_perf_domain() - Unregister Energy Model (EM) for a device
> + * @dev : Device for which the EM is registered
> + *
> + * Try to unregister the EM for the specified device (but not a CPU).
> + */
> +void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) || !dev->em_pd)
> + return;
> +
> + if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&em_pd_mutex);

Is the mutex really needed?

If this function is called that means there is no more user of the
em_pd, no?

> + em_debug_remove_pd(dev);
> +
> + kfree(dev->em_pd->table);
> + kfree(dev->em_pd);
> + dev->em_pd = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&em_pd_mutex);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_dev_unregister_perf_domain);
>


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-01 23:47    [W:0.187 / U:1.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site