lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 2/6] exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index d4387bc92292..82106241ed53 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec)
* Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be
* seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal
* signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised
- * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below).
+ * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below).
*/
int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
{
--
2.20.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-08 20:48    [W:0.460 / U:2.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site