Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Fri, 08 May 2020 13:44:46 -0500 | Subject | [PATCH 2/6] exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment |
| |
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- fs/exec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index d4387bc92292..82106241ed53 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec) * Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be * seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal * signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised - * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below). + * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below). */ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) { -- 2.20.1
| |