lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] memory: tegra: EMC scaling is not a clock provider
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:32:34PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Tegra EMC scaling support code is not a clock provider, but merely a
> clock consumer, and thus does not need to include
> <linux/clk-provider.h>.
>
> However, drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-table.c relies on
> tegra210-emc.h to include <linux/of.h> through <linux/clk-provider.h>.
> Hence the first patch makes <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> self-contained
> first.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven (2):
> of: Make <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> self-contained
> memory: tegra: Drop <linux/clk-provider.h>
>
> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-core.c | 1 -
> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc.h | 1 -
> include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Ah... I should've read the cover letter first. Looks like I need to take
that first patch through the Tegra tree as well to avoid introducing the
build error in the second patch.

Rob, do you mind if I pick up patch 1 of this into the same OF branch
that I already carry the memory-region-names patches on?

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-07 22:08    [W:0.084 / U:1.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site