lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:52:44PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:13:47AM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > chained to this message is a second version of remaining patches from the
> > first spin of the "DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs" [1] patch set.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@v3.sk/
> >
> > I've attempted to address the review of the v1, each patch includes a
> > detailed change log.
> >
> > Compared to v1, wherever the license or maintainer information was
> > missing, I've filled in GPL-2.0-only and people listed in MAINTAINERS
> > file. As I've indicated in v1 cover letter, am not sure whether this is
> > the optimal course of action. However I've included the relevant people
> > in v1 Cc list and asked for clarifications, but didn't really get any
> > feedback to that.
>
> Find someone that would care if the bindings are deleted. I'm fine
> if you put yourself. Maybe subsystem maintainers are willing to take
> orphans. I really only want my name on common things.

Thanks for clarification & fixups to the patches.

I'm wondering if Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst could
perhaps be made a bit clearer about how the maintainer key in a binding
document is different from what is in the MAINTAINERS file.

> Rob

Lubo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-30 20:17    [W:0.110 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site