lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 1/3] optee: do drivers initialization before and after tee-supplicant run
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 22:56, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 14:52 +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> > Some drivers (like ftpm) can operate only after tee-supplicant
> > runs becase of tee-supplicant provides things like storage
> > services. This patch splits probe of non tee-supplicant dependable
> > drivers to early stage, and after tee-supplicant run probe other
> > drivers.
>
> Fix the typos and remove extra spaces (one space after '.').
>
> Why "tee-supplicant" and not "TEE-supplicant"?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org>
> > Suggested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 10 +++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > index 99698b8a3a74..d059e3ac491c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <linux/tee_drv.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > #include "optee_private.h"
> > #include "optee_smc.h"
> > #include "shm_pool.h"
> > @@ -218,6 +219,15 @@ static void optee_get_version(struct tee_device *teedev,
> > *vers = v;
> > }
> >
> > +static void optee_bus_scan(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + rc = optee_enumerate_devices(PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP);
> > + if (rc)
> > + pr_err("optee_enumerate_devices failed %d\n", rc);
> > +}
>
> Is pr_err() required really here? Why not just pr_info()?
>
> Why have it all and not just ftrace when needed? There is series going
> on to add CONFIG_FTRACE_FUNC_PROTOTYPE to that to get return values and
> arguments.
>

Actually if optee_enumerate_devices() fail then I would say there is
something wrong with memory or Secure OS and more likely we should
stop execution.
I think something line WARN_ON might be more suitable here. What do you think?

> > +
> > static int optee_open(struct tee_context *ctx)
> > {
> > struct optee_context_data *ctxdata;
> > @@ -241,8 +251,18 @@ static int optee_open(struct tee_context *ctx)
> > kfree(ctxdata);
> > return -EBUSY;
> > }
> > - }
> >
> > + if (!optee->scan_bus_done) {
> > + INIT_WORK(&optee->scan_bus_work, optee_bus_scan);
> > + optee->scan_bus_wq = create_workqueue("optee_bus_scan");
> > + if (!optee->scan_bus_wq) {
> > + pr_err("optee: couldn't create workqueue\n");
>
> Neither get pr_err() here. Please remove this one completely.
>

What is the benefit of removing print here? Kernel binary size?

> > + return -ECHILD;
> > + }
> > + queue_work(optee->scan_bus_wq, &optee->scan_bus_work);
> > + optee->scan_bus_done = true;
> > + }
> > + }
> > mutex_init(&ctxdata->mutex);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctxdata->sess_list);
> >
> > @@ -296,8 +316,10 @@ static void optee_release(struct tee_context *ctx)
> >
> > ctx->data = NULL;
> >
> > - if (teedev == optee->supp_teedev)
> > + if (teedev == optee->supp_teedev) {
> > + destroy_workqueue(optee->scan_bus_wq);
> > optee_supp_release(&optee->supp);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static const struct tee_driver_ops optee_ops = {
> > @@ -675,7 +697,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, optee);
> >
> > - rc = optee_enumerate_devices();
> > + rc = optee_enumerate_devices(PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES);
> > if (rc) {
> > optee_remove(pdev);
> > return rc;
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c
> > index e3a148521ec1..d4931dad07aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c
> > @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
> > * TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS - Incorrect input param
> > * TEE_ERROR_SHORT_BUFFER - Output buffer size less than required
> > */
> > -#define PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES 0x0
> >
> > static int optee_ctx_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
> > {
> > @@ -32,7 +31,8 @@ static int optee_ctx_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
> > }
> >
> > static int get_devices(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 session,
> > - struct tee_shm *device_shm, u32 *shm_size)
> > + struct tee_shm *device_shm, u32 *shm_size,
> > + u32 func)
> > {
> > int ret = 0;
> > struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg inv_arg;
> > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int get_devices(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 session,
> > memset(&param, 0, sizeof(param));
> >
> > /* Invoke PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES function */
> > - inv_arg.func = PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES;
> > + inv_arg.func = func;
> > inv_arg.session = session;
> > inv_arg.num_params = 4;
> >
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid, u32 device_id)
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > -int optee_enumerate_devices(void)
> > +static int __optee_enumerate_devices(u32 func)
> > {
> > const uuid_t pta_uuid =
> > UUID_INIT(0x7011a688, 0xddde, 0x4053,
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ int optee_enumerate_devices(void)
> > goto out_ctx;
> > }
> >
> > - rc = get_devices(ctx, sess_arg.session, NULL, &shm_size);
> > + rc = get_devices(ctx, sess_arg.session, NULL, &shm_size, func);
> > if (rc < 0 || !shm_size)
> > goto out_sess;
> >
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ int optee_enumerate_devices(void)
> > goto out_sess;
> > }
> >
> > - rc = get_devices(ctx, sess_arg.session, device_shm, &shm_size);
> > + rc = get_devices(ctx, sess_arg.session, device_shm, &shm_size, func);
> > if (rc < 0)
> > goto out_shm;
> >
> > @@ -158,3 +158,8 @@ int optee_enumerate_devices(void)
> >
> > return rc;
> > }
> > +
> > +int optee_enumerate_devices(u32 func)
> > +{
> > + return __optee_enumerate_devices(func);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > index d9c5037b4e03..8b71839a357e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ struct optee_supp {
> > * @memremaped_shm virtual address of memory in shared memory pool
> > * @sec_caps: secure world capabilities defined by
> > * OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_* in optee_smc.h
> > + * @scan_bus_done flag if device registation was already done.
> > + * @scan_bus_wq workqueue to scan optee bus and register optee drivers
> > + * @scan_bus_work workq to scan optee bus and register optee drivers
> > */
> > struct optee {
> > struct tee_device *supp_teedev;
> > @@ -89,6 +92,9 @@ struct optee {
> > struct tee_shm_pool *pool;
> > void *memremaped_shm;
> > u32 sec_caps;
> > + bool scan_bus_done;
> > + struct workqueue_struct *scan_bus_wq;
> > + struct work_struct scan_bus_work;
> > };
> >
> > struct optee_session {
> > @@ -173,7 +179,9 @@ void optee_free_pages_list(void *array, size_t num_entries);
> > void optee_fill_pages_list(u64 *dst, struct page **pages, int num_pages,
> > size_t page_offset);
> >
> > -int optee_enumerate_devices(void);
> > +#define PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES 0x0
> > +#define PTA_CMD_GET_DEVICES_SUPP 0x1
> > +int optee_enumerate_devices(u32 func);
> >
> > /*
> > * Small helpers
>
> No exalanation of "scan bus" neither in the comments nor in the code.
>

Idea was when tee-supplicant opens /dev/tee-priv0 then we run
workqueue (to not hold current open()) and do bus scan for TA
applications which require tee-supplicant run. There is no "scan bus"
as API. The is optee_enumerate_devices() is split up on 2 stages.

Maxim.

> /Jarkko
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-28 10:27    [W:0.047 / U:0.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site