lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()
From
Date
> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.

> Co-developed-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>

I guess that this tag should usually trigger another consequence like the following.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=b0c3ba31be3e45a130e13b278cf3b90f69bda6f6#n548

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>


Is there a need to tag also the patch review contribution of Lai Jiangshan?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAJhGHyC4XcNL8yzWZKZ=73wZJej4JwCaAHGV8qjYn-AqcEAEjQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1442889/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/26/201


I am unsure if such aspects will matter after Tejun Heo responded with the information
“Applied to wq/for-5.8.” to the previous patch version yesterday.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200527135214.GI83516@mtj.thefacebook.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1443888/


> v1->v2->v3->v4->v5->v6:
> Modify weakly submitted information and tag.

I am curious how our imaginations and preferences will evolve further
also for such wording selections.

Regards,
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-28 10:08    [W:0.035 / U:17.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site