lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: gpiolib: Allow GPIO IRQs to lazy disable
From
Date
Hi,

On 5/27/2020 3:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-05-23 10:11:10)
>> With 'commit 461c1a7d4733 ("gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable")' gpiolib
>> overrides irqchip's irq_enable and irq_disable callbacks. If irq_disable
>> callback is implemented then genirq takes unlazy path to disable irq.
>>
>> Underlying irqchip may not want to implement irq_disable callback to lazy
>> disable irq when client drivers invokes disable_irq(). By overriding
>> irq_disable callback, gpiolib ends up always unlazy disabling IRQ.
>>
>> Allow gpiolib to lazy disable IRQs by overriding irq_disable callback only
>> if irqchip implemented irq_disable. In cases where irq_disable is not
>> implemented irq_mask is overridden. Similarly override irq_enable callback
>> only if irqchip implemented irq_enable otherwise irq_unmask is overridden.
>>
>> Fixes: 461c1a7d47 (gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable)
> This isn't a proper Fixes line. Should have quotes
>
> Fixes: 461c1a7d4733 ("gpiolib: override irq_enable/disable")
Thanks for pointing this, i will address in next revision.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 13 +++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> index eaa0e20..3810cd0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> @@ -2465,32 +2465,37 @@ static void gpiochip_irq_relres(struct irq_data *d)
>> gpiochip_relres_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
>> }
>>
>> +static void gpiochip_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
>> +{
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> +
>> + if (gc->irq.irq_mask)
>> + gc->irq.irq_mask(d);
>> + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
> How does this work in the lazy case when I want to drive the GPIO? Say I
> have a GPIO that is also an interrupt. The code would look like
>
> struct gpio_desc *gpio = gpiod_get(...)
> unsigned int girq = gpiod_to_irq(gpio)
>
> request_irq(girq, ...);
>
> disable_irq(girq);
> gpiod_direction_output(gpio, 1);
>
> In the lazy case genirq wouldn't call the mask function until the first
> interrupt arrived on the GPIO line. If that never happened then wouldn't
> we be blocked in gpiod_direction_output() when the test_bit() sees
> FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ? Or do we need irqs to be released before driving
> gpios?

The client driver can decide to unlazy disable IRQ with below API...

 irq_set_status_flags(girq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);

This will immediatly invoke mask function (unlazy disable) from genirq,
even though irq_disable is not implemented.

Thanks,
Maulik
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gpiochip_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
>> +{
>> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> +
>> + gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
>> + if (gc->irq.irq_unmask)
>> + gc->irq.irq_unmask(d);
>> +}
>> +

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-27 13:27    [W:0.251 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site