lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 06:03:35PM -0400, Don Porter wrote:
>On 5/26/20 4:27 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>I'm really worried about the disconnect between how you view the current
>>state of Graphene (and the industry) vs Intel and the various cloud
>>providers.
>>
>>You keep suggesting that its just past the academic research state,
>>while Intel and the big cloud providers are already pushing it to
>>external customers.  Every one of those cloud providers has a preview/GA
>>secure enclave offering.
>>
>
>I wonder if you are conflating Graphene with SGX? I understand that
>many cloud vendors are offering SGX in preview/GA, but there are other
>frameworks to build these offerings on, such as Intel's SGX SDK or
>Haven. It would be news to me if every major cloud vendor were
>putting Graphene in production.

Sorry, I wasn't trying to suggest that all cloud vendors are pushing
Graphene, but rather than SGX enabled platforms became a commodity
product, users will end up using Graphene-like applications.

Let me provide an example:
https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/protecting-go-language-applications-with-the-graphene-library-os-on-intel%C2%AE-sgx%C2%AE-secured-alibaba-cloud_594889
- a "practical" guide on how to run Graphene in production environment
on one of the big cloud vendor platforms.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-27 00:52    [W:0.092 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site