[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Borislav Petkov <> writes:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen? Or
> >> is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now?
> >
> > I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said
> > something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on
> > IRC at some point later. :)
> locking/kcsan is not the problem (it just has more fixes on top)
> core/rcu is the one which diverged and caused the merge conflict with
> PPC to happen twice. So Paul needs to remove the stale core/rcu bits and
> rebase on the current version (which is not going to change again).

So there will be another noinstr-rcu-* tag, and I will rebase on top
of that, correct? If so, fair enough!

Thanx, Paul

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-23 17:07    [W:0.038 / U:10.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site