lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] thermal: imx8mm: Add get_trend ops
From
Date
On 23/05/2020 02:35, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
>
>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: imx8mm: Add get_trend ops
>>
>> On 13/05/2020 04:58, Anson Huang wrote:
>>> Add get_trend ops for i.MX8MM thermal to apply fast cooling mechanism,
>>> when temperature exceeds passive trip point, the highest cooling
>>> action will be applied, and when temperature drops to lower than the
>>> margin below passive trip point, the lowest cooling action will be
>>> applied.
>>
>> You are not describing what is the goal of this change.
>
> The goal of this change is to make sure whenever temperature exceeds passive trip point,
> the highest cooling action will be applied immediately, e.g., if there are many cpufreq OPP,
> the default cooling will be step by step, it will take some more rounds to make cpufreq drop
> to lowest OPP, while on i.MX, we expect the cpufreq drop to lowest OPP immediately.

Whatever the slope of the temperature increase?

>> IIUC, the resulting change will be an on/off action. The thermal zone is
>> mitigated with the highest cooling effect, so the lowest OPP, then the
>> temperature trend is stable until it goes below the trip - margin where the
>> mitigation is stopped.
>
> Yes, your understanding is correctly, once the temperature exceeds passive trip point,
> the highest cooling action will be applied immediately and then it will be stable there
> until temperature drop to trip - margin, then the cooling action will be cancelled, the
> margin is to avoid the back and forth near the passive trip point.
>
>>
>> Except, I'm missing something, setting a trip point with a 10000 hysteresis and
>> a cooling map min/max set to the highest opp will result on the same.
>
> Yes setting cooling map min/max cooling state to highest OPP will make the highest
> cooling action applied immediately, and to have the function of cooling action being
> cancelled when temperature drops to trip - margin, I have to define another trip point,
> say passive trip point is 85000, and cooling map min/max set to highest OPP in passive
> trip point then add another trip point named "active" with 75000, and without any
> cooling map in it, right?

May be I misunderstood but only the change as below is needed. No need
to add a trip point, especially an 'active' trip which is a for an
active cooling device like a fan.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
index cc7152ecedd9..bea263bd06b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ cooling-maps {
map0 {
trip = <&cpu_alert0>;
cooling-device =
- <&A53_0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
- <&A53_1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
- <&A53_2 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
- <&A53_3 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
+ <&A53_0 2 2>,
+ <&A53_1 2 2>,
+ <&A53_2 2 2>,
+ <&A53_3 2 2>
};
};
};

> If yes, then I think I can try to make the changes in DT instead of thermal driver.


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-23 14:34    [W:0.097 / U:10.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site