lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm, memcg: Decouple e{low,min} state mutations from protection checks
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:07 AM Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> wrote:
>
> Chris Down writes:
> >Yafang Shao writes:
> >>I will do it.
> >>If no one has objection to my proposal, I will send it tomorrow.
> >
> >If the fixup patch works, just send that. Otherwise, sure.
>
> Oh, I see the other reply from Naresh now saying it didn't help.
>
> Sure, feel free to do that for now then while we work out what the real problem
> is.

Regarding the root cause, my guess is it makes a similar mistake that
I tried to fix in the previous patch that the direct reclaimer read a
stale protection value. But I don't think it is worth to add another
fix. The best way is to revert this commit.

--
Thanks
Yafang

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-22 18:28    [W:0.035 / U:18.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site