lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] dt-bindings: timer: Add CLINT bindings
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/22/20 1:54 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:35 AM Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/21/20 9:45 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
> >>> +Required properties:
> >>> +- compatible : "sifive,clint-1.0.0" and a string identifying the actual
> >>> + detailed implementation in case that specific bugs need to be worked around.
> >>
> >> Should the "riscv,clint0" compatible string be documented here? This
> >
> > Yes, I forgot to add this compatible string. I will add in v2.
> >
> >> peripheral is not really specific to sifive, as it is present in most
> >> rocket-chip cores.
> >
> > I agree that CLINT is present in a lot of non-SiFive RISC-V SOCs and
> > FPGAs but this IP is only documented as part of SiFive FU540 SOC.
> > (Refer, https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pdf)
> >
> > The RISC-V foundation should host the CLINT spec independently
> > under https://github.com/riscv and make CLINT spec totally open.
> >
> > For now, I have documented it just like PLIC DT bindings found at:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.txt
>
> The PLIC seems to have its own RISC-V-sponsored documentation [1] which
> was split off from the older privileged specs. By your logic above,
> should it be renamed to riscv,plic0.txt (with a corresponding change in
> the documented compatible strings)?
>
> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec

For PLIC bindings, we can certainly do the renaming because now
we have PLIC v1 specification hosted on RISC-V Foundation Github.

Regards,
Anup

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-22 08:36    [W:0.053 / U:1.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site