lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] iio: position: iqs624: remove usage of iio_priv_to_dev()
Hi Alexandru,

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 09:53:22AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> We may want to get rid of the iio_priv_to_dev() helper. That's a bit
> uncertain at this point. The reason is that we will hide some of the
> members of the iio_dev structure (to prevent drivers from accessing them
> directly), and that will also mean hiding the implementation of the
> iio_priv_to_dev() helper inside the IIO core.
>
> Hiding the implementation of iio_priv_to_dev() implies that some fast-paths
> may not be fast anymore, so a general idea is to try to get rid of the
> iio_priv_to_dev() altogether.
>
> For this driver, removing iio_priv_to_dev() also means keeping a reference
> on the state struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/position/iqs624-pos.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

As a customer of iio, I find it handy that there is an "inverse" to iio_priv.
In this particular case it saves the container iio_dev from storing a pointer
to itself.

That being said, this patch is perfectly fine and I have no objection if this
is the route you and Jonathan opt to take. And so:

Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>

>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/position/iqs624-pos.c b/drivers/iio/position/iqs624-pos.c
> index 77096c31c2ba..520dafbdc48f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/position/iqs624-pos.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/position/iqs624-pos.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>
> struct iqs624_pos_private {
> struct iqs62x_core *iqs62x;
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> struct notifier_block notifier;
> struct mutex lock;
> bool angle_en;
> @@ -59,7 +60,7 @@ static int iqs624_pos_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
>
> iqs624_pos = container_of(notifier, struct iqs624_pos_private,
> notifier);
> - indio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(iqs624_pos);
> + indio_dev = iqs624_pos->indio_dev;
> timestamp = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
>
> iqs62x = iqs624_pos->iqs62x;
> @@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ static int iqs624_pos_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> static void iqs624_pos_notifier_unregister(void *context)
> {
> struct iqs624_pos_private *iqs624_pos = context;
> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(iqs624_pos);
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iqs624_pos->indio_dev;
> int ret;
>
> ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&iqs624_pos->iqs62x->nh,
> @@ -243,6 +244,7 @@ static int iqs624_pos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> iqs624_pos = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> iqs624_pos->iqs62x = iqs62x;
> + iqs624_pos->indio_dev = indio_dev;
>
> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> indio_dev->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Kind regards,
Jeff LaBundy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-23 03:55    [W:0.060 / U:1.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site