Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 May 2020 16:51:43 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] spi: dw: Discard static DW DMA slave structures |
| |
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:12:28PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Well, for me both solutions are equal except mine consumes less stack memory. > The only reason why your solution might be better is that if DW DMA driver or > the DMA engine subsystem changed the dw_dma_slave structure instance passed to > the dma_request_channel() method, which non of them do. So I'll leave this for > Mark to decide. Mark, could you give us your final word about this?
Honestly I'm struggling to care either way. I guess saving a bit of stack is potentially useful. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |