[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: x86/smp: adding new trace points
On 13/05/2020 13:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> Why would the SMP call function single interrupt go through the
> PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR? It goes as the name says through the

Wrong vector, my bad.

However 2) still stands in my opinion. We don't have "ipi raise" trace point for x86.
RESCHEDULE_VECTOR, CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR, as well as TLB invalidation vectors are essentially inter-processor-interrupts if I'm not mistaken.
Would a patch adding such trace point be considered here?


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-13 16:42    [W:0.054 / U:1.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site