lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/2] Historical Service Time Path Selector
Date
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> writes:

> OK, that concall's issue had nothing to do with needing higher
> resolution time (was about IOPs realized with requested-based vs
> bio-based).
>
> Reality is, DM won't need anything higher resolution than jiffies until
> block core's interfaces require something other than jiffies
> (e.g. generic_end_io_acct).
>
> So feel free to proceed with the conditional time fetch solution you
> were going to run with (prior to my previous mail asking you to hold
> off).
>
> Sorry for the noise. Thanks,
> Mike

No problem, thanks for the information. I get started on it.


--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-11 20:46    [W:0.127 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site