lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 06/13] arm: dts: s5pv210: aries: Add support for more devices
From
Date
Hi Krzysztof,

On 2020-05-01 6:31 a.m., Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> Well, it may not be in the bindings, but the driver definitely requires it :) See drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c
>>
>> What's the best way of dealing with this situation?
>
> I'll send a patch fixing the bindings. However don't you miss the
> AVDD1-supply in such case? Driver should report error.
>

Thanks for sending the patch.

AVDD1 and DCVDD are provided internally, via drivers/regulator/wm8994.c and are enabled
by wlf,ldo1ena and wlf,ldo2ena pins. It's a bit messy, but that's how it's done.

>>
>>>> + CPVDD-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
>>>> + SPKVDD1-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
>>>> + SPKVDD2-supply = <&buck3_reg>;
>>>> +
>>>> + wlf,gpio-cfg = <0xa101 0x8100 0x0100 0x0100 0x8100
>>>> + 0xa101 0x0100 0x8100 0x0100 0x0100
>>>> + 0x0100>;
>>>> +
>>>> + wlf,ldo1ena = <&gpf3 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>>> + wlf,ldo2ena = <&gpf3 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>>> +
>>>> + wlf,lineout1-se;
>>>> + wlf,lineout2-se;
>>>> +
>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&clocks MOUT_CLKOUT>;
>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <0>;
>>>> + assigned-clock-parents = <&xusbxti>;
>>>> +
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&codec_ldo>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + i2c_accel: i2c-gpio-1 {
>>>> + compatible = "i2c-gpio";
>>>> + sda-gpios = <&gpj3 6 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
>>>> + scl-gpios = <&gpj3 7 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
>>>> + i2c-gpio,delay-us = <2>;
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&accel_i2c_pins>;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* bma023 accelerometer, no mainline binding */
>>>
>>> status disabled ... unless you need it for user-space I2C tools?
>>>
>>
>> Nope, but wanted to add them all in due to adding the si4709 in galaxys. I was having
>> issues with accidentally overwriting previously named nodes (ie having i2c-gpio-0 in
>> both the common dtsi and the device specific dts) so I wanted to get the numbers
>> nailed down.
>
> So add them with status disabled. This will document the HW without
> enabling empty I2C GPIO bus.

Sounds good, will do.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>


Thanks,
Jonathan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-05-01 21:44    [W:0.067 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site