Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Apr 2020 18:06:43 +0300 | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] vsprintf: don't obfuscate NULL and error pointers |
| |
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 04:38:25PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:31 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:45 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:23 PM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Petr, > > > > > > Bump, as I don't see this in linux-next or other public branches. > > > The discussion was split between several threads, revolving around > > > the vision for how lib/test_printf.c should be structured, but the > > > fix itself wasn't disputed. > > > > > > Could you please pick it up for 5.7-rc1? If you want to restructure > > > the test suite before adding any new test cases, v1 doesn't have them. > > > Other than the test cases, the only difference between v1 and v2 is > > > added reviews and acks. > > > > Petr has some obstacles that prevent him to pay attention on this and > > actually do anything right now for Linux kernel. > > If Rasmus, Sergey, you and maybe others will got consensus here, I > > think Andrew can take it thru his tree. > > Thanks for letting us know, Andy. > > Other than Petr, two people are listed as maintainers of vsprintf.c: > Sergey and Steve. Both of them were fine with v1 (no tests) and sent > their acks. > > Rasmus, you wanted to see some tests, so I posted v2. However Petr > wanted to restructure the test suite first, and it didn't seem like you > him agreed on what exactly that should look like. Which would you > prefer to be picked by Andrew, v1 or v2?
I think it's question to maintainers. I'm a reviewer here.
For the better understanding the current state of affairs I suggest to respin new version after rc1 and we will see again.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |