lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM no-flag
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:17 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:42PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> > Add the description of PWM_NOFLAGS flag property.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
>
> As I already wrote in reply to the v1 series I'd prefer a name for 0
> that explicitly handles normal polarity.

Uwe, AFAIU, there is no flag that forces normal polarity, the normal polarity
is the default state if there is no flag to invert the polarity is set.
'0' value in the bit flags cell really means there are no flags set
for the PWM instance.

>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |



--
Best regards
Oleksandr Suvorov

Toradex AG
Ebenaustrasse 10 | 6048 Horw | Switzerland | T: +41 41 500 48 00

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-07 12:52    [W:0.050 / U:0.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site