lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/5] bus: mhi: core: Make sure to powerdown if mhi_sync_power_up fails
On 2020-04-07 09:50, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> Powerdown is necessary if mhi_sync_power_up fails due to a timeout, to
> clean up the resources. Otherwise a BUG could be triggered when
> attempting to clean up MSIs because the IRQ is still active from a
> request_irq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> index 3285c9e..fbffc6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/pm.c
> @@ -922,7 +922,11 @@ int mhi_sync_power_up(struct mhi_controller
> *mhi_cntrl)
> MHI_PM_IN_ERROR_STATE(mhi_cntrl->pm_state),
> msecs_to_jiffies(mhi_cntrl->timeout_ms));
>
> - return (MHI_IN_MISSION_MODE(mhi_cntrl->ee)) ? 0 : -EIO;
> + ret = (MHI_IN_MISSION_MODE(mhi_cntrl->ee)) ? 0 : -EIO;

Does it make sense to return -ETIMEDOUT instead of -EIO if device fails
to move to mission mode?
Controller can use this info as mhi_async_power_up() would not return
-ETIMEDOUT.

> + if (ret)
> + mhi_power_down(mhi_cntrl, false);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mhi_sync_power_up);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-08 03:34    [W:0.072 / U:8.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site