lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Prevent sleep when rproc crashes
On Tue 07 Apr 15:59 PDT 2020, rishabhb@codeaurora.org wrote:

> On 2020-04-07 15:29, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Wed 19 Feb 18:11 PST 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> >
> > > Remoteproc recovery should be fast and any delay will have an impact
> > > on the
> > > user-experience. Use power management APIs (pm_stay_awake and
> > > pm_relax) to
> > > ensure that the system does not go to sleep.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > index 5ab65a4..52e318c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > @@ -1712,6 +1712,8 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct
> > > work_struct *work)
> > >
> > > if (!rproc->recovery_disabled)
> > > rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
> > > +
> > > + pm_relax(&rproc->dev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /**
> > > @@ -2242,6 +2244,8 @@ void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > enum rproc_crash_type type)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + pm_stay_awake(&rproc->dev);
> >
> > Following Mathieu's question I was expecting you to do this on
> > rproc->dev.parent.
> >
> > But looking at the implementation of pm_stay_awake(), it ends up being a
> > nop if dev->power.wakeup isn't specified. This in turn seems to come
> > from device_wakeup_enable(), which will bail if dev->power.can_wakeup is
> > not set. But I don't see where this would be set for either the platform
> > driver or the remoteproc's struct device - and neither one of them have
> > a "wakeup" attribute in sysfs.
> >
> > Is there some additional plumbing needed for this?
> We should be able to create a standalone wakeup source using
> wakeup_source_init.
> Then we can use _pm_stay_awake and _pm_relax on it.

Afaict the way to do this would be to call device_wakeup_enable() on
either the remoteproc or platform driver's struct device.

Given that the resources related to waking up the system are associated
with the platform driver I think this should be done on the platform
driver's struct device and these calls should operate on the rproc's
parent.

Regards,
Bjorn

> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > +
> > > dev_err(&rproc->dev, "crash detected in %s: type %s\n",
> > > rproc->name, rproc_crash_to_string(type));
> > >
> > > --
> > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-08 01:28    [W:0.039 / U:2.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site