lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version
    Date
    > > > @@ -8441,7 +8441,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
    > > > __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
    > > > if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
    > > > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
    > > > (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
    > > > - (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
    > > > + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
    > > > + (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
    > >
    > > I don't think these checkups of UFSHCI version is necessary, does the UFSHCI
    > have other version number except these?
    > > Is there somebody still v1.0 and v1.1?
    >
    > Probably. I think we can leave them or change the dev_err to a dev_warn.
    > This way we have logs in case someone is using a non-supported version.
    >
    > What do you think ?
    >
    Hi, Jose
    Seems after your patch, all of current released UFS control versions will be supported except the
    version suffix is non-zero. Right?

    > ---
    > Thanks,
    > Jose Miguel Abreu

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-04-29 15:00    [W:2.805 / U:0.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site